Comedy Actors In Superhero Movies

ant-man_trailer_screengrab_2_h_2015

Most of the time, in comic book movies, we like our superheroes mighty and daring, but, also likeable and often witty. In our villains we want an evil calculated side whilst desiring a sense of humour that is smart and fiendish. Both of these traits suggest that there should be more comedy actors in superhero and villain roles. Comedy is often mentioned by great actors as being the hardest thing to do right. However, the past has proven that it can be an absolute disaster to hire a comedic actor to play your superhero or villain unless they are mocking and parodying.

The most notorious case of a villain being cast in a comedic role was Jim Carrey as The Riddler in Batman Forever. In 1995, Carrey could of been in whatever movie he so wished. He was unequivocal box office gold and producers knew anything he was in would make massive amounts of money. However, Batman Forever was a critical disaster and almost ruined the franchise before Batman and Robin plodded along to finish the job several years later.

The-Riddler-two-face

That’s not to say that Carrey was the worst thing in Batman Forever, the massive influence from the campiness of the 1960’s show that strayed away from the world created in Batman and Batman Returns by Tim Burton and the horrible chemistry between the leading actors Val Kilmer, Nicole Kidman and Chris O’Donnell, also has to take the blame somewhat. Carrey has a body of work that any actor would envy, both in comedy with The Mask, Dumb and Dumber and the wickedly dark and massively underrated The Cable Guy, and drama, for Eternal Sunshine of The Spotless Mind and The Truman Show in which he should have won best actor ahead of Roberto Benigini in 1999.

However, looking back at Batman Forever, you see how miscast he was. It was like director Joel Schumacher let him do whatever he wanted on set and just rolled the cameras whilst he improvised continuously. His moments and jokes in the film go on too long and make The Riddler little more than a farce rather than a threat. The Riddler should be Batman’s psychological equal and challenge Bruce Wayne’s intellect with his genius and cunning. Instead, he just dances around the room with Tommy Lee Jones’ Two Face and doing weird accents whilst prancing and laughing.

There is a big parallel for me with Richard Pryor’s casting in Superman III in which director Richard Lester let him improvise for huge amounts of time which turned the film’s tone into something strange and centred the movie on the story of Pryor’s character as opposed to that of Superman. Superman very much became the second string character in his own movie because Richard Pryor was beloved by the American public and directors thought he could be shoehorned in to lend humour to the franchise. It would be like Kevin Hart or Rob Schneider being the sidekick to Henry Cavill’s Man of Steel in the upcoming Batman v Superman. Just writing this now, I remember, with regret that Rob Schneider already played a sidekick to Sly Stallone’s Judge Dredd…

the_green_hornet10

Other cases include that of Seth Rogen in The Green Hornet. Like Jim Carrey and Richard Pryor you could say that Rogen is also the comedian of his generation, he is always guaranteed to make a huge amount of money at the box office with his comedies and he is massively well liked, some would go as far to say he has been the era defining comedian of the past decade. Unfortunately, the move to a superhero film didn’t suit him. It’s a lot more likely that the disastrous outcome of the film was not because of Seth Rogen and his inability to be serious or understand the tone of the movie. It’s a lot more to do with the many production and personnel issues on the movie.

Rogen has stated in interviews that when he wrote the movie with co-writer Evan Goldberg they had an idea that started well and began to change as the budget escalated. The screenplay was often heavily scrutinized by studio executives, nipping needlessly at pieces of dialogue. This explains the confusing tone of The Green Hornet which is constantly changing. Director Michel Gondry, better known for his excellent independent films, had also never worked on a big budget movie before. Even though the same can be said of Jurassic World’s Colin Trevorrow, at least he had the support from Steven Spielberg and studio executives who knew what they could expect and just wanted to make the best film they could.

The Green Hornet was not Rogen’s fault, like Batman Forever wasn’t Jim Carrey’s, but they’re the ones who get left with the mess while the director’s, the writers and the rest of the cast go about their careers without any criticism by the mainstream audiences. Because they are actors more known for another genre, they are pinpointed and given the most criticism as clueless hacks tell them to go back to “what they do best”. Although not strictly a comic actor you could argue Ryan Reynolds got a similar treatment as both Deadpool in the abysmal X-Men Origins: Wolverine, which he is atoning for with his forthcoming standalone movie, and the perennially derided The Green Lantern.

Which brings me to Marvel’s newest offering Ant-Man. It’s been over a ten year wait as the baton of director has been passed from Edgar Wright to Peyton Reed but throughout the entirety of Ant-Man’s production history the lead actor has always stayed the same. Paul Rudd is an actor of immense quality and is known mostly as a comedy actor; it is the genre that he has appeared in most and if you were to think of three Paul Rudd films off the top of your head the chances are they would be comedies.

Both the filmmakers and Rudd are taking a huge risk with Ant-Man because if this film flops, it will flop hard, considering Marvel are currently on such a winning streak. Sadly is would be harder for Rudd to recover than Marvel, it won’t ruin his career but it will be a blot on an otherwise wonderful oeuvre. He will forever be known as Ant-Man which would always have those negative connotations and would be the face of the Marvel movie that didn’t quite meet the standards of the others. Some people survive the bad reviews, comedic actor or not (George Clooney in Batman and Robin) and some don’t (Brandon Routh in Superman Returns and arguably Halle Berry in Catwoman) we will see what the audiences think in a few weeks’ time.

What Marvel are great at doing in terms of casting is hiring actors who are deemed serious actors, and then add the comedy as opposed to hiring comedians and then writing the script to suit them. The Marvel writers make the characters witty and funny, and that is due to great writing and the charisma of the actors, especially the likes of Robert Downey Jr. But it’s fair to say Paul Rudd could boast the same amount of charisma as any of The Avengers.

These days you don’t see too many comedians in these films. When people like Kevin Hart, Adam Sandler, Ricky Gervais, Jonah Hill and Jason Segel are making millions and millions of pounds with their movies why would they want to risk sullying their career with a massive flop of a superhero film. They don’t need that grief, especially as the superhero movies now move into the deep echelons of darkness; there may not even be room for these talented actors within the genre.

I think Paul Rudd is going to excellent as Ant-Man, whether the film will be equally great is another matter. He can take a ray of light from the fact that before The Guardians of The Galaxy last year, Chris Pratt was primarily a comic actor with Parks and Rec, The Five Year Engagement and What’s Your Number, with only really cameo appearance in films like Moneyball and Zero Dark Thirty to flex his acting chops, but has now established himself into the go to action hero for casting directors in Hollywood.

Fire, Theft and Acts of Zod

man-of-steel-destruction-zod-cost

(Warning: Man of Steel Spoilers)

Last week, like so many, I indulged myself in Zack Snyder’s Superman reboot, Man of Steel. Despite being a relative novice when it comes to all things Kal-El, I thoroughly enjoyed it. Although it has a lot to do before comparison with The Dark Knight trilogy, apart from the Nolan/Goyer/DC connections, there is still plenty to like. Henry Cavill really bought a great subtlety to both his Kryptonian and Earthling characters, Russell Crowe was on top form as Jor-El, Michael Shannon’s Zod had genuine antagonistic motivations and the story was very watchable and easy to become involved in.

However, one thing I have problems, in many superhero and sci-fi films lately, is the sheer amount of needless destruction and civilian deaths. Films like The Avengers, Transformers and Star Trek into Darkness have shown that it’s ok if thousands, if not millions of people are killed in an intergalactic crossfire. It’s like they have been competing for how many skyscrapers they can digitally bring down. Nobody cares about a couple of towering office blocks that may contain a huge number of innocent women and children anymore. As long as we complete our mission we can mourn for the fallen people later after the shawarma.

the avengers 1

Man of Steel is hugely guilty of a biblical scale of wanton destruction. The last act alone must accumulate a body count in the thousands as General Zod and his Kryptonian brethren reek havoc on Metropolis. Worse than that, in trying to stop him, Superman inflicts just as much damage on his city. Skyscrapers turn to rubble, local amenities in tatters and local leisure facilities are no more. At least a claim could be made and the insurance companies could pay out? Well, I’d wager their offices are nothing but dust.

Now, I know the destruction of one city is insignificant considering the entire of Krypton was destroyed. But, in the final scene where Zod is threatening a family of four, Superman can’t do enough to help them, but the faceless thousands in the tower blocks will have to live with their fate.

130416-Trailer01

Maybe it’s indicative of a post 9/11 America that all skyscrapers will fall without a second thought. I’m sure that the sheer amount of these Superhero films found success, in part, because America is in a period of their history where terrorism is a constant threat and the need for a hero is greater than ever. Man of Steel also shows its own armed forces joining Superman to fight which gives an extra patriotic aspect.

Some will argue that the destruction is an attempt to show the threat of the villain and what they are capable of. Some will argue that it’s an excuse to use a huge amount of CGI, and since it’s become so widely available and easy to use, filmmakers just can’t help themselves going over the top. I don’t agree with the last point too much because Snyder is known from going over the top but we see from 300 and Watchmen he has the ability to use CGI in a way that helps with the story instead of merely using it as a distraction from it.

man-of-steel-spot-blackzero2

Maybe the destruction in these films is for a different purpose. One great theory I heard was that Metropolis would be built up from nothing by Lex Luthor, which would in turn set up the next movie. There were already trucks with LexCorp hidden throughout the movie and it would be a very logical step to take.

I know that many were surprised and deafened by the obliteration of Metropolis, however, I still found the story entertaining, I liked the scenes between Kal-El with Amy Adams’ Lois Lane or his parents in Smallville and it made me want to know more about the Kryptonians and as I sit here considering a second viewing it’s leaving me wondering one thing, do insurance companies even pay out for acts of Zod?

Will The Justice League Film Work?

character_bio_576_justiceleague-e1350592528180

Last year, Marvel’s The Avengers (or Avenger’s Assemble in the U.K) triumphed at the box-office. Making over $1.5 billion worldwide it blew all other movies out the water financially, including Warner Brothers’ The Dark Knight Rises, which was originally suspected to be the king of the superhero film in 2012. Joss Whedon managed to combine the myriad of superheroes and create an exciting, intense and very likeable film all under two and a half hours. Even the most passionate comic book fans had their reservations about how the amount of characters could combine effectively and how the previous films may intertwine without confusing a virgin audience member. However, Whedon quickly quashed all fears in one fell swoop, with style.

Iron Man in The Avengers

Warner Brothers, who own the rights to the D.C comics would obviously have seen the success of Avengers and wanted to do something along those lines. Especially with the end of the hugely successful Dark Knight trilogy and their summer release Man of Steel still being an unknown quantity. The obvious answer was finally to make and release the ill fated Justice League movie that has in recent years suffered delays and all sorts of commotion.

The Justice League of America is a band of heroes in the DC comics that, like The Avengers, unite to fight evil, whether it’s the Legion of Doom of whomever. Their group includes, among many others that are constantly changing, Batman, Superman, The Green Lantern, Wonder Woman, The Flash and Aquaman. These are the best known to the average movie goer, although only three have recently appeared on screen, and would most likely be those which the movie centres around. How would this band work together on screen though?

The movie is planned for 2015, colliding head on, not only with The Avengers 2, but competing with Star Wars VII, the most hotly anticipated film of the decade. Currently Justice League has no director, although George Miller, Zack Snyder and more recently Ben Affleck and Christopher Nolan have been linked. There is no knowing if the current Superman (Henry Cavill), Green Lantern (Ryan Reynolds) and Batman (Christian Bale) have agreed to sign up. There has also been a lack of screen presence from The Flash and Wonder Woman, two of the key members of the league. Also, will Justice League continue with the realistic, worldly tone of The Dark Knight and Man of Steel or change it to something more light hearted? Warner Brothers truly have their work cut out here with a lot to think about.cavill-man-of-steel

With only two years before the prospective release date there really needs to be some progress this year if it’s going to even come close to mirroring the success of The Avengers. Perhaps Warner is waiting for audience response to Man of Steel before deciding on a director. A success will surely catapult Snyder to top of the directing list, with possibly Nolan and writer David S. Goyer added to impose an essence of Dark Knight. Then, the cast needs to be established. If Bale and Cavill are replaced it has to be the right kind of actor that replaces them. This will be a very tricky task, especially because, Bale especially, has already spent the best part of a decade making the Batman character his.

The characters who have yet to appear on screen also have to be great actors because it is these versions of iconic heroes like Wonder Woman and The Flash that are going to be scrutinised by the fans. Most vitally, however, the script needs to be sharp, funny and have a solid plot that the audience can follow, relate to and altogether enjoy.

I don’t know if Justice League will make its deadline of 2015. It seemed something of a knee jerk reaction by Warner to Marvel’s success. However, it will be interesting to watch this space because there is certainly great potential in this series and its heroes.